Comparison | Laser Cleaning | Chemical Cleaning | Mechanical Grinding | Dry ice cleaning |
Washing Method | non-contact cleaning | contact cleaning | Abrasive contact cleaning | non-contact cleaning |
Harm to base material | None | Yes | Yes | None |
Washing Efficiency | High | Low | Low | Mid. |
Consumable | Power | Chemical Detergent | Abrasive paper, grinder, abrasive stone | Dry Ice |
Washing result | renovated like new | Medium, uneven | Medium, uneven | Good, uneven |
Precision Washing | Accuracy controllable. High precision | Uncontrollable, low precision. | Uncontrollable, medium precision. | Uncontrollable, poor precision. |
Safety/Environment | No pollution | Chemical pollution | Dust pollution | No pollution |
Operation | Easy to operate, portable or automation optional. | Complicated process, higher technical requirement of the operator. Pollution prevention measures required. | Need more time & manpower. Pollution prevention measures required. | Easy to operate, portable or automatic. |
Investment | High investment on machine. But no consumable, low maintenance cost | Low investment on machine. But expensive consumables | Medium investment on machine. High man-power cost. | Medium investment on machine. High consumable cost. |
Contact Person : | Airy Wang |
---|